Structure and process: differences around the theory of teaching in Body Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
When we analyze the theory of teaching in the field of Physical Education, we did not find that the theory articulates with the idea of structure. The concept that stands out is that of process, but not only Physical Education, didactics also states it as: teaching-learning process (E-A process). The intention is to show what we understand and what differences we find between the idea of structure and that of process. At the same time, we questioned the supposed relationship of proportionality between teaching-learning that Physical Education supports in its theory. We understand a proportional relationship as an equality relationship that exists between two reasons. For example, between teaching and learning there must be a relationship of proportionality between what is taught and what must be learned. At the same time, it is often understood that this relationship is of direct proportionality: the two magnitudes increase or decrease in the same proportion, that is, if there is more teaching there is more learning or inversely, less teaching-less learning.
The idea of structure articulated to the Corporal Education, allows to think a theory of the teaching of the corporal practices (CP), avoiding the supposed relation of proportionality present in the teaching-learning process. In other words, in Body Education it is not estimated that there is a relationship/proportion teaching–learning.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This magazine is available in open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
References
Behares, L. (Dir.); Bordoli, E., Fernández, A. M; Ros, O. (2004). Didáctica mínima. Los acontecimientos del saber. Montevideo: Psicolibros-Waslala.
Blázquez Sánchez, D. (1986). Iniciación a los deportes de equipo: I. Del juego al deporte: de los 6 a los 10 años. Barcelona: Ediciones Martínez Roca.
Crisorio, R. (2019). Conferencia: “Ciencia e investigación”, presentada el 1 de octubre de 2019 en el “13º Congreso Argentino y 8º Latinoamericano de Educación Física y Ciencias”, Depto. Educación Física, FaHCE–UNLP, inédito.
Eidelsztein, A. (2019). El concepto de estructura de Lacan. Conferencia presentada el 2 de julio de 2019 en el Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú. Recuperado de: https://www.eidelszteinalfredo.com.ar/conferencia–estructura–en–el–hospital–dr–enrique–tornu–presentada–el–2–de–julio–de–2019/
Ferrater Mora, J. (1971). Diccionario de Filosofía. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
Hawking, S. (2015). Historia del tiempo. Del big bang a los agujeros negros. Buenos Aires: Crítica.
Hawking, S. (2016). La gran ilusión. Las grandes obras de Albert Einstein. Buenos Aires: Crítica.
Hawking, S. y Mlodinow L. (2013). El gran diseño. Buenos Aires: Crítica.
Hernández Moreno, J. (2000). La iniciación a los deportes desde su estructura y dinámica. Aplicaciones a la Educación Física Escolar y al Entrenamiento Deportivo. Barcelona: INDE Publicaciones.
Koyré, A., (1994). Pensar la ciencia. Barcelona: Paidos.
Koyré, A. (2007). Estudios de historia del pensamiento científico. México: Siglo XXI editores.
Sánchez Bañuelos, F. (1986). Bases para una didáctica de la educación física y el deporte. Madrid: Gymnos Editorial.